Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7700X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 7700X is 1253 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Core i3-9100F
- Up to 75% cheaper than Ryzen 7 7700X - $63.06 vs $251.31
- Up to 69% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 7 7700X - $0.36 vs $1.18 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 7700X - 65 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 7 7700X
- Performs up to 22% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-9100F - 213 vs 174 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 16 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
174
82%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€63.06
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €63.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7085 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
213
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.18/FPS
31%
Price, €
€251.31
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for €251.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7084 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-9100F | vs | Ryzen 7 7700X |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |