Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 1253 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Core i3-9100F
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - $56.81 vs $259.70
- Up to 78% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i7-13700K - $0.33 vs $1.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 3% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i3-9100F - 195 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 24 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
190
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€63.06
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €63.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
195
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.48/FPS
22%
Price, €
€288.27
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for €288.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-9100F | vs | Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |