Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 2378 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Core i3-3210
- Up to 26% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600 - $63.06 vs $84.68
- Up to 12% better value when playing Battlefield V than Ryzen 5 3600 - $0.30 vs $0.34 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 19% better in Battlefield V than Core i3-3210 - 248 vs 209 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 12 vs 4 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €63.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7111 minutes ago
Buy for €84.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7112 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3210 | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |