The Core i3-10110U is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-6300. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i3-10110U
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 74% less energy – 25 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of the FX-6300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 6 vs 4 threads
Core i3-10110U vs FX-6300 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-10110U
Aug 21st, 2019
Average FPS
151
100%
Min 1% FPS
113
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i3-10110U vs FX-6300 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10110U vs FX-6300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10110U vs FX-6300 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10110U
Aug 21st, 2019
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
60%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
FX-6300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-10110U | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-6300 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Aug 21st, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $1.32 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Comet Lake-U | Codename | Vishera |
25 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.1 GHz |
| 4 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3, DDR4 | RAM | DDR3 @ 1866 MHz |
| UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
