Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600X outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600X is 3626 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of FX-6300
- Up to 71% cheaper than Ryzen 5 7600X - $47.09 vs $159.89
- Up to 64% better value when playing God of War than Ryzen 5 7600X - $0.32 vs $0.90 per FPS
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 7600X - 95 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 5 7600X
- Performs up to 21% better in God of War than FX-6300 - 197 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €52.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 104 minutes ago
Buy for €177.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 104 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-6300 | vs | Ryzen 5 7600X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |