Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600KF outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600KF is 3299 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of FX-6300
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i5-12600KF - $47.09 vs $117.35
- Up to 54% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i5-12600KF - $0.19 vs $0.41 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i5-12600KF
- Performs up to 17% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than FX-6300 - 321 vs 274 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 16 vs 6 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €52.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 187 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
321
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
46%
Price, €
€130.26
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for €130.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 187 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-6300 | vs | Core i5-12600KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |