The Core i3-10105 is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-8120 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's only $15.29 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i3-10105
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of the FX-8120
- Up to 18% cheaper – $70.29 vs $85.58
Core i3-10105 vs FX-8120 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-10105
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
187
100%
Min 1% FPS
124
100%
Price, €
€85.58
82%
Value, €/FPS
€0.45/FPS
93%
Core i3-10105 vs FX-8120 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105 vs FX-8120 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105 vs FX-8120 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
FX-8120
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
77%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-10105 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-8120 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| $122.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.1 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.4 GHz |
| 6 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
