Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 21 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Celeron G6900
- Up to 35% cheaper than Core i3-12100F - $45.04 vs $69.19
- Up to 32% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i3-12100F - $0.36 vs $0.53 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 6% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G6900 - 131 vs 124 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
124
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€45.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €45.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7121 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
131
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.53/FPS
68%
Price, €
€69.19
65%
FPS Winner
Buy for €69.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7122 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G6900 | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 58 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |