Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 2583 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6300.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 20% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-6300 - 156 vs 130 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6300 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Core i3-6300
- Up to 71% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X - $88.23 vs $307.38
- Up to 66% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Ryzen 9 7900X - $0.75 vs $2.19 per FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 51 vs 170 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
156
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.19/FPS
34%
Price, €
€341.19
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for €341.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
130
83%
Value, €/FPS
€0.75/FPS
100%
Price, €
€97.93
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €97.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 9 7900X | vs | Core i3-6300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raphael | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
170 W | TDP | 51 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
47.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |