Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600X is 2583 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6300.
Advantages of Core i3-6300
- Up to 46% cheaper than Ryzen 5 7600X - $97.93 vs $180.17
- Up to 35% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Ryzen 5 7600X - $0.24 vs $0.37 per FPS
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 7600X - 51 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 5 7600X
- Performs up to 19% better in Battlefield IV than Core i3-6300 - 487 vs 408 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6300 - 12 vs 4 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
408
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€97.93
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €97.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7384 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
487
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
65%
Price, €
€180.17
54%
FPS Winner
Buy for €180.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7385 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-6300 | vs | Ryzen 5 7600X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Skylake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |