Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 2682 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6300.
Advantages of Core i3-6300
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $88.23 vs $730.45
- Up to 87% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i5-13400F - $0.34 vs $2.57 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 9% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i3-6300 - 316 vs 290 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6300 - 16 vs 4 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
290
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€97.93
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €97.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 216 minutes ago
Buy for €810.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 215 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-6300 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |