Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-950 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-950 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 4174 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-950.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 21% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-950 - 203 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Core i7-950 - 105 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-950 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i7-950
- Up to 76% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5950X - $68.30 vs $279.19
- Up to 71% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 9 5950X - $0.45 vs $1.53 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €309.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
Buy for €75.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 9 5950X | vs | Core i7-950 |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2009 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Vermeer | Codename | Bloomfield |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 130 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |