Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600GT outperforms the cheaper Core i7-950 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-950 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600GT is 5333 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-950.
Advantages of Core i7-950
- Up to 35% cheaper than Ryzen 5 5600GT - $75.81 vs $117.12
- Up to 29% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Ryzen 5 5600GT - $0.65 vs $0.92 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 5 5600GT
- Performs up to 10% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i7-950 - 128 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-950 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-950 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-950 doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €75.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6788 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
128
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.92/FPS
71%
Price, €
€117.12
64%
FPS Winner
Buy for €117.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6787 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-950 | vs | Ryzen 5 5600GT |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |