Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-950 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-950 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 4865 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-950.
Advantages of Core i7-950
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - $75.81 vs $279.28
- Up to 62% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-13700K - $0.66 vs $1.75 per FPS
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 39% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-950 - 160 vs 115 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-950 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-950 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-950 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €75.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6799 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
160
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.75/FPS
38%
Price, €
€279.28
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for €279.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6799 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-950 | vs | Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |