Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 1405 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6300.
Advantages of Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 2% better in World of Tanks than Core i3-6300 - 542 vs 529 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6300 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Core i3-6300
- Up to 15% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3700X - $88.23 vs $103.88
- Up to 10% better value when playing World of Tanks than Ryzen 7 3700X - $0.19 vs $0.21 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €115.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 159 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
529
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€97.93
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €97.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 158 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 7 3700X | vs | Core i3-6300 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Matisse | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |