Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600G outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600G is 3471 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
- Performs up to 19% better in No Man's Sky than FX-8150 - 186 vs 156 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 41% cheaper than Ryzen 5 5600G - $59.97 vs $102.35
- Up to 30% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Ryzen 5 5600G - $0.43 vs $0.61 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
FPS
186
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.61/FPS
70%
Price, €
€113.61
58%
FPS Winner
Buy for €113.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
Buy for €66.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 85 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Apr 13th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Cezanne | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Radeon Vega 7 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |