Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 4102 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 127% better in The Callisto Protocol than FX-8150 - 161 vs 71 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $59.97 vs $658.06
- Up to 79% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Core i5-13400F - $0.94 vs $4.54 per FPS
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €730.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
Buy for €66.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |