Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7700X outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 7700X is 4003 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
- Performs up to 41% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-8150 - 213 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 73% cheaper than Ryzen 7 7700X - $59.97 vs $224.43
- Up to 62% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 7 7700X - $0.44 vs $1.17 per FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
213
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.17/FPS
38%
Price, €
€249.12
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for €249.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 27 minutes ago
Buy for €66.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 27 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | FX |
Raphael | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
4.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 125 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
45.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |