The Radeon R9 Nano is a slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 3050. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 Nano
The GeForce RTX 3050 is better in every way
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 3050
- A much faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 26% less energy – 130 vs 175 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce RTX 3050 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 Nano
Aug 27th, 2015
Average FPS
72
87%
Min 1% FPS
37
84%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 3050
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
83
100%
Min 1% FPS
44
100%
Price, €
€171.16
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.06/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€171.16
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€162.15
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€172.40
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€208.09
In Stock
Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce RTX 3050 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce RTX 3050 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce RTX 3050 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 Nano
Aug 27th, 2015
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
256 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
8.192 TFLOPS
90%
GeForce RTX 3050
Jan 4th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
44%
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
89%
Texture Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
56%
FP32
9.098 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 Nano | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 3050 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 27th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| $649.00 | MSRP | $249.00 |
| Pirate Islands | Generation | GeForce 30 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 175 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| HBM | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 4096-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
64 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 56.86 GPixel/s |
256 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 142.2 GTexel/s |
| 8.192 TFLOPS | FP32 | 9.098 TFLOPS |
