The Radeon R9 Nano is a much slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6600. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 Nano
The Radeon RX 6600 is better in every way
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6600
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 25% less energy – 132 vs 175 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
Radeon R9 Nano vs Radeon RX 6600 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 Nano
Aug 27th, 2015
Average FPS
72
76%
Min 1% FPS
37
71%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 6600
Oct 13th, 2021
Average FPS
95
100%
Min 1% FPS
52
100%
Price, €
€243.52
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.56/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€243.52
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€234.23
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€260.36
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€306.30
In Stock
Radeon R9 Nano vs Radeon RX 6600 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 Nano vs Radeon RX 6600 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 Nano vs Radeon RX 6600 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 Nano
Aug 27th, 2015
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
40%
Texture Fillrate
256 GTexel/s
92%
FP32
8.192 TFLOPS
92%
Radeon RX 6600
Oct 13th, 2021
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
44%
Pixel Fillrate
159.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
279 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
8.928 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 Nano | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 27th, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 13th, 2021 |
| $649.00 | MSRP | $329.00 |
| Pirate Islands | Generation | Navi II |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 175 W | Power Consumption | 132 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| HBM | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 4096-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 64 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 159.4 GPixel/s |
| 256 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 279 GTexel/s |
| 8.192 TFLOPS | FP32 | 8.928 TFLOPS |
