The Radeon R9 Nano is a slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 980 Ti. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 Nano
- Consumes up to 30% less energy – 175 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 980 Ti
- A faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 4 GB
Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 Nano
Aug 27th, 2015
Average FPS
72
90%
Min 1% FPS
37
88%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Jun 2nd, 2015
Average FPS
80
100%
Min 1% FPS
42
100%
Price, €
€899.1
100%
Value, €/FPS
€11.23/FPS
100%
Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 Nano
Aug 27th, 2015
Memory
4 GB
67%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
62%
Texture Fillrate
256 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
8.192 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Jun 2nd, 2015
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
336.6 GB/s
66%
Pixel Fillrate
103.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
189.4 GTexel/s
74%
FP32
6.06 TFLOPS
74%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 Nano | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Aug 27th, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2015 |
| $649.00 | MSRP | $649.00 |
| Pirate Islands | Generation | GeForce 900 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
175 W | Power Consumption | 250 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
| HBM | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 4096-bit | Memory Bus | 384-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 336.6 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 64 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 103.3 GPixel/s |
256 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 189.4 GTexel/s |
8.192 TFLOPS | FP32 | 6.06 TFLOPS |
