Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce GTX 1650

Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce GTX 1650: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

vs

GeForce GTX 1650

4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo
MSI Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 128-Bit HDMI/DP/DVI 4GB GDRR6 HDCP Support DirectX 12 VR Ready OC Graphics Card (GTX 1650 D6 Ventus XS OC)

Buy for 196.21 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 440 minutes ago

vs

GeForce GTX 1650

4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo
MSI Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 128-Bit HDMI/DP/DVI 4GB GDRR6 HDCP Support DirectX 12 VR Ready OC Graphics Card (GTX 1650 D6 Ventus XS OC)

Buy for 196.21 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 440 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 1335 days older than GeForce GTX 1650.

Advantages of Radeon R9 Nano

  • Performs up to 38% better in Overwatch 2 than GeForce GTX 1650 - 95 vs 69 FPS

Advantages of GeForce GTX 1650

  • Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 75 vs 175 Watts
Calculator background
This is a free version of Overwatch 2.
Overwatch 2

Overwatch 2

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Epic

AMD Radeon R9 Nano Logo
Radeon R9 Nano

Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015


FPS

95

100%

Value, €/FPS

Price, €

FPS Winner

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo
GeForce GTX 1650

Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019


FPS

69

73%

Value, €/FPS

€2.84/FPS

100%

Price, €

€196.21

100%

Value Winner

MSI Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 128-Bit HDMI/DP/DVI 4GB GDRR6 HDCP Support DirectX 12 VR Ready OC Graphics Card (GTX 1650 D6 Ventus XS OC)

Buy for 196.21 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 440 minutes ago

My Games

With selected game settings

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Epic

AMD Radeon R9 Nano Logo
Radeon R9 Nano

Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo
GeForce GTX 1650

Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019

Theoretical Performance

AMD Radeon R9 Nano Logo
Radeon R9 Nano

Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015


Pixel Fillrate

64 GPixel/s

100%

Texel Fillrate

256 GTexel/s

100%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo
GeForce GTX 1650

Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019


Pixel Fillrate

53.28 GPixel/s

83%

Texel Fillrate

93.24 GTexel/s

36%

AMD Radeon R9 Nano Logo

Radeon R9 Nano

vs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo

GeForce GTX 1650

Aug 27th, 2015
Apr 23rd, 2019
Pirate IslandsGeForce 16
$649
$149
1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
1x 8-pinNone
Desktop
Desktop
4 GB4 GB
HBMGDDR5
4096-bit128-bit
512 GB/s
128.1 GB/s
1000 MHz
1485 MHz
Not Available1665 MHz
500 MHz
2001 MHz

PCs Using Radeon R9 Nano or GeForce GTX 1650

With selected game settings

Copyright © 2025 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.