The Radeon R9 270X is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 2080 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $531.53 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon R9 270X
- Up to 68% cheaper – $251.35 vs $782.88
- Consumes up to 16% less energy – 180 vs 215 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 2080
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce RTX 2080 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 270X
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
51
45%
Min 1% FPS
23
35%
Price, €
€251.35
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.92/FPS
100%
GeForce RTX 2080
Sep 20th, 2018
Average FPS
114
100%
Min 1% FPS
65
100%
Price, €
€782.88
32%
Value, €/FPS
€6.86/FPS
72%
Buy on Amazon
€782.88
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€991.74
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€8.06
In Stock
Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce RTX 2080 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce RTX 2080 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce RTX 2080 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 270X
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
40%
Pixel Fillrate
33.6 GPixel/s
31%
Texture Fillrate
84 GTexel/s
27%
FP32
2.688 TFLOPS
27%
GeForce RTX 2080
Sep 20th, 2018
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
109.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
314.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
10.07 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 270X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 2080 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 20th, 2018 |
$199.00 | MSRP | $699.00 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 20 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
180 W | Power Consumption | 215 W |
Memory | ||
2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
256-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
179.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
33.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 109.4 GPixel/s |
84 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 314.6 GTexel/s |
2.688 TFLOPS | FP32 | 10.07 TFLOPS |