The Radeon R7 250 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $652.27 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon R7 250
- Up to 91% cheaper – $67.55 vs $719.82
- Consumes up to 67% less energy – 55 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 1500% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 1 GB
Radeon R7 250 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
May 18th, 2023
Average FPS
128
100%
Min 1% FPS
75
100%
Price, €
€719.82
9%
Value, €/FPS
€5.62/FPS
28%
Buy on Amazon
€719.82
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
N/A
Out of Stock
Buy on Amazon
N/A
Out of Stock
Buy on Amazon
N/A
Out of Stock
Radeon R7 250 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R7 250 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R7 250 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R7 250
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
1 GB
6%
Memory Bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
10%
Pixel Fillrate
14.8 GPixel/s
12%
Texture Fillrate
29.6 GTexel/s
9%
FP32
947.2 GFLOPS
4%
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
May 18th, 2023
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
22.06 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R7 250 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | May 18th, 2023 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $499.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 40 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
55 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
| Memory | ||
| 1 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 28.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 14.8 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 121.7 GPixel/s |
| 29.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 344.8 GTexel/s |
| 947.2 GFLOPS | FP32 | 22.06 TFLOPS |
