The Radeon R7 250 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 590 GME and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $40.55 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon R7 250
- Up to 38% cheaper – $67.55 vs $108.10
- Consumes up to 69% less energy – 55 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 590 GME
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 1 GB
Radeon R7 250 vs Radeon RX 590 GME for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 590 GME
Mar 9th, 2020
Average FPS
70
100%
Min 1% FPS
35
100%
Price, €
€108.1
62%
Value, €/FPS
€1.54/FPS
100%
Radeon R7 250 vs Radeon RX 590 GME in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R7 250 vs Radeon RX 590 GME in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R7 250 vs Radeon RX 590 GME in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R7 250
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
1 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
11%
Pixel Fillrate
14.8 GPixel/s
33%
Texture Fillrate
29.6 GTexel/s
14%
FP32
947.2 GFLOPS
14%
Radeon RX 590 GME
Mar 9th, 2020
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
45.44 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
204.5 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
6.543 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R7 250 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 9th, 2020 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
55 W | Power Consumption | 175 W |
| Memory | ||
| 1 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 28.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 256 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 14.8 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 45.44 GPixel/s |
| 29.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 204.5 GTexel/s |
| 947.2 GFLOPS | FP32 | 6.543 TFLOPS |
