The Radeon R7 250 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $94.60 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon R7 250
- Up to 58% cheaper – $67.55 vs $162.15
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 55 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 500% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 1 GB
Radeon R7 250 vs GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Oct 29th, 2019
Average FPS
81
100%
Min 1% FPS
43
100%
Price, €
€162.15
41%
Value, €/FPS
€2/FPS
80%
Buy on Amazon
€162.15
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€171.16
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€242.34
In Stock
Radeon R7 250 vs GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R7 250 vs GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R7 250 vs GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R7 250
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
1 GB
17%
Memory Bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
9%
Pixel Fillrate
14.8 GPixel/s
17%
Texture Fillrate
29.6 GTexel/s
19%
FP32
947.2 GFLOPS
19%
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Oct 29th, 2019
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
336 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
85.68 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
157.1 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.027 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R7 250 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 29th, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $229.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
55 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Memory | ||
| 1 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
| 28.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 336 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 14.8 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 85.68 GPixel/s |
| 29.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 157.1 GTexel/s |
| 947.2 GFLOPS | FP32 | 5.027 TFLOPS |
