Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Xeon W3680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 4677 days newer than Xeon W3680.
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 62% better in Starfield than Xeon W3680 - 73 vs 45 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3680 - 16 vs 12 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
73
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.03/FPS
100%
Price, €
€148.1
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €148.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 81 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon W3680 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
130 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |