Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms Xeon X5680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 4048 days newer than Xeon X5680.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 26% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon X5680 - 146 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Xeon X5680 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5680 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
146
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€210.77
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €210.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11702 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2010
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5680 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |