Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105T outperforms Xeon X5680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105T is 4048 days newer than Xeon X5680.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5680
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105T - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105T
- Performs up to 6% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon X5680 - 165 vs 155 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Xeon X5680 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5680 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
165
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€216.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €216.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11710 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2010
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5680 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105T |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i3 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |