Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Xeon W3520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 3751 days newer than Xeon W3520.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 23% better in Battlefield V than Xeon W3520 - 254 vs 206 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon W3520 - 105 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3520 - 24 vs 8 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon W3520
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Ryzen 9 3900X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3520 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
