Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-3175X outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-3175X is 538 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-3175X
- Performs up to 4% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 176 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 56 vs 24 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Xeon W-3175X - 180 vs 255 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
169
96%
Value, €/FPS
€2.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€379.64
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6601 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jan 30th, 2019
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-3175X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 30th, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Xeon W | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 3647 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
28 | Cores | 12 |
56 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
255 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |