Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Xeon W-2135 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 975 days newer than Xeon W-2135.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 6% better in Rust than Xeon W-2135 - 207 vs 195 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon W-2135 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W-2135 - 20 vs 12 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
207
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€292.83
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €292.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 147 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Aug 29th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-2135 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Aug 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon W | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |