Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-2135 outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-2135 is 728 days newer than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-2135
- Performs up to 10% better in Remnant II than Celeron G3900 - 88 vs 80 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Xeon W-2135 - 51 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-2135 doesn't have integrated graphics
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
80
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.65/FPS
100%
Price, €
€51.75
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €51.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 154 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 29th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-2135 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Aug 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Xeon W | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |