Buy on Amazon
€51.75
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $444
Availability
MSRP in USD: $444
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-2125 outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-2125 is 728 days newer than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-2125
- Performs up to 4% better in Battlefield 1 than Celeron G3900 - 241 vs 231 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Xeon W-2125 - 51 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-2125 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
231
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€51.75
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3900 2,80GHz Tray CPU
Buy for €51.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 161 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon W-2125
Server/Workstation • Aug 29th, 2017
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-2125 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Xeon W | Collection | Celeron |
| Skylake | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 120 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
