Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 4900HS outperforms Xeon E5645 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 4900HS is 3644 days newer than Xeon E5645.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
- Performs up to 19% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Xeon E5645 - 143 vs 120 FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Xeon E5645 - 35 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5645 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5645 doesn't have integrated graphics
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5645
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Ryzen 9 4900HS
Mobile • Mar 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5645 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 7th, 2020 |
| Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Renoir |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket FP6 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 12 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics 512SP |
| No | Overclockable | No |
