Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 4900HS outperforms Xeon E5-2630 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 4900HS is 2007 days newer than Xeon E5-2630 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
- Performs up to 7% better in No Man's Sky than Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 176 vs 165 FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 35 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 9 4900HS
Mobile • Mar 7th, 2020
Xeon E5-2630 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Ryzen 9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Renoir | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 16 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 85 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Radeon Graphics 512SP | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
