Buy on Amazon
€425.94
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 3698 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5620
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 80 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 38% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon E5620 - 602 vs 435 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5620 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-10900K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
602
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.71/FPS
100%
Price, €
€425.94
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel BX8070110900K Core i9-10900K (Basistakt: 3,70GHz; Sockel: LGA1200; 125Watt) Box
Buy for €425.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15360 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5620
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Core i9-10900K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5620 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 8 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
