Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900 outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900 is 4312 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900
- Performs up to 77% better in Starfield than Xeon E5620 - 76 vs 43 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5620 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5620 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
76
100%
Value, €/FPS
€6.85/FPS
100%
Price, €
€520.52
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €520.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60990 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Single-Core
373
15.082895268904165%
Multi-Core
1410
10.809567617295308%
Intel Xeon E5620 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |