Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 4333 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 24% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E5620 - 145 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than Intel Xeon E5620 - 58 vs 80 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5620
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Core i3-12100F
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5620 | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i3 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 58 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
