Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 2696 days newer than Xeon E5-2680 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 20% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 147 vs 123 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 58 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 24 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-12100F | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
58 W | TDP | 120 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |