Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 2745 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 8% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i3-4160T - 184 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 35 vs 58 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i3-12100F
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-12100F | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Alder Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 58 W | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
