Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms Xeon E5530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 3751 days newer than Xeon E5530.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5530
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 9% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E5530 - 126 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5530 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5530 doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
126
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.5/FPS
100%
Price, €
€63.55
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €63.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3447 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5530 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Gainestown | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |