Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms Xeon E5530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 2346 days newer than Xeon E5530.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5530
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Xeon E5530 - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Xeon E5530 - 51 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5530 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
190
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€68.52
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €68.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3450 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5530 | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i3 |
Gainestown | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
80 W | TDP | 51 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |