Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Xeon E5520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 3076 days newer than Xeon E5520.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5520
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 80 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 10% better in No Man's Sky than Xeon E5520 - 170 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5520 - 16 vs 8 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
170
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.06/FPS
100%
Price, €
€180.62
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €180.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 181 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5520 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Gainestown | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 180 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |