Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 2262 days newer than Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-13900 - 44 vs 32 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 21% better in Battlefield V than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 285 vs 236 FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 65 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €526.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76889 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Single-Core
1175
43.294030950626386%
Multi-Core
9619
58.55960063314258%
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 24 |
44 | Threads | 32 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
145 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |