Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 2163 days newer than Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 44 vs 32 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 3% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 195 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 14% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 125 vs 145 Watts
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €470.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76885 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Single-Core
1175
39.52236797847292%
Multi-Core
9619
47.853340629819414%
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 24 |
44 | Threads | 32 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
145 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |