Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2687W outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2687W is 1274 days older than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2687W
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2687W - 51 vs 150 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2687W doesn't have integrated graphics
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
227
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€51.75
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €51.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 356 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2687W | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
150 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |