Buy on Amazon
€51.75
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Xeon E5-2665 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1274 days newer than Xeon E5-2665.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2665
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 2% better in Ready or Not than Xeon E5-2665 - 239 vs 235 FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2665 - 51 vs 115 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2665 doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
239
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€51.75
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3900 2,80GHz Tray CPU
Buy for €51.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E5-2665
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2665 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 115 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
