Buy on Amazon
€502.5
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $333
Availability
MSRP in USD: $333
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms Xeon E5-2660 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 2604 days newer than Xeon E5-2660.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2660
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 17% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2660 - 134 vs 115 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2660 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i7-9700F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
134
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.75/FPS
100%
Price, €
€502.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
INTEL Core i7-9700F 8Core bis 4,7GHz ohne Prozessor Graphics LGA1151 300 Series 65W
Buy for €502.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 121 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E5-2660
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Core i7-9700F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2660 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
