Buy on Amazon
€205.04
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $612
Availability
MSRP in USD: $612
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms Xeon E5-2630L v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2381 days newer than Xeon E5-2630L v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 55 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 12% better in DOOM Eternal than Xeon E5-2630L v3 - 522 vs 466 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Core i5-11600K
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
522
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€205.04
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-11600K 11. Generation Desktop Prozessor (Basistakt: 3.9GHz Tuboboost: 4.9GHz, 6 Kerne, LGA1200) BX8070811600K
Buy for €205.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Xeon E5-2630L v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i5-11600K
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Xeon E5-2630L v3 or Core i5-11600K
DOOM Eternal, 1920 x 1080, Nightmare
253 FPS
€4.56/FPS
Radeon RX 6750 XT
Core i5-11600K
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
€1,154.9
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
